Regie:
Wes CravenDrehbuch:
Kevin WilliamsonKamera:
Peter DemingMusik:
Marco BeltramiBesetzung:
Neve Campbell, Courteney Cox, David Arquette, Jerry O'Connell, Jamie Kennedy, Laurie Metcalf, Elise Neal, Timothy Olyphant, Sarah Michelle Gellar (mehr)Streaming (4)
Inhalte(1)
Zwei Jahre sind vergangen, seit zwei Killer die verschlafene Kleinstadt Woodsboro terrorisierten. Die Fernsehjournalistin Gale Weathers hat die Ereignisse von damals in ihrem Bestseller ,,The Woodsboro Murders" festgehalten. Doch der Frieden ist nur von kurzer dauer. Inzwischen wurde das Buch verfilmt. Noch während der Vorpremiere des Films schlägt der dämonische Killer wieder zu. Wieder hat er es auf Sidney Prescott (Neve Campbell) abgesehen. Und wieder fordert er ein Opfer nach dem anderen... (Kinowelt)
(mehr)Videos (1)
Kritiken (5)
Eines meiner liebsten Kinoerlebnisse in den 1990er Jahren. Damals schrieb ich auch eine Rezension für die Schülerzeitung geschrieben. Scream 2 hat alles, was ein angehender aktiver Zuschauer zu schätzen wissen weiß. Ein Film im Film (Scream / Blade), Popkultur-Referenzen in jedem Dialog, Humor, Spannung, eine sehr untypische Romanze und ein karikiertes College-Setting. Tori Spelling hat sich zu einem Gastauftritt hinreißen lassen, es gibt einen hervorragenden Aufbau des gegenseitigen Beschnupperns unter den Arquettes (die Anspielungen auf Friends gehen weiter), zitiert werden Top Gun und Nosferatu, eine Symphonie des Grauens. Es ist nur schade, dass die eigentliche Filmwissenschaft nie so amüsant war wie damals, als Randy die Stunden besuchte.
()
There's not much in terms of fear or atmosphere. The actors aren't worth much, and Neve Campbell can’t light a candle to the queen of the genre Jamie Lee Curtis. Pretty disappointing. Quite a lot, actually.
()
To continue where the probably best teenage horror movie ended and not disappoint is no small feat, and the fact that Wes Craven and Kevin Williamson managed it so well that they even matched the original is almost applaudable. The second Scream will forever be just the second one because of its predecessor, but thanks to divine dialogue, a flood of my beloved actors in supporting roles (Sarah Michelle Gellar and Timothy Olyphant do not disappoint) and a few really well-conceived twists, this is still a smart, bloody-action bit of entertainment that I don't mind being pleasantly scared by at all.
()
The sequel plays it relatively safe, but it significantly ups the body count compared to the first film, which I definitely appreciate. However, there are moments when it feels like we’ve seen this before. That said, the lighter tone of the film is refreshing, and the returning characters are a delight. The ending is also quite surprising! I’m curious to see what the third installment will bring. For me, it's 6.5/10.
()
All in all, it's pretty much the same crazy mess as the first one, except that this time the effect is accompanied by a sense of déjà vu and the story, which was only ironically exaggerated in the first part, is now a blatant parody of itself. And it’s precisely because it doesn’t take itself seriously, because of the debate around how pointless second episodes are, and because of the noticeable increase in the number of deaths and stabbings, that the second Scream somehow managed to win me over and keep my attention for the entire 110 minutes. The old faces are once again excellent in their famous roles, and the ageing Craven still manages to pull off thrilling scenes in a very impressive way. The story may be nothing but just a caricature of the first one and a mockery of many horror B-movies, but it’s still very entertaining. 70%
()
Galerie (44)
Photo © StudioCanal
![Scream 2 - Covers](http://image.pmgstatic.com/cache/resized/w663/files/images/film/photos/165/726/165726699_32af35.jpg)
Werbung