Regie:
Zack SnyderKamera:
Larry FongMusik:
Tyler BatesBesetzung:
Gerard Butler, Lena Headey, David Wenham, Dominic West, Vincent Regan, Rodrigo Santoro, Andrew Tiernan, Isabelle Champeau, Michael Fassbender (mehr)Streaming (5)
Inhalte(1)
In der visuell berauschenden Adaption des Kultcomics von Frank Miller trotzen 300 bewaffnete und wohlgeölte Spartaner unter der Führung ihres Königs Leonidas (Gerard Butler) einer persischen Übermacht, die im Begriff ist das antike Griechenland zu unterwerfen und zu versklaven. Leonidas verlässt seine geliebte Frau Gorgo (Lena Headey) um mit seinen besten Männern der heranrückenden persischen Armada des sich gottgleich wähnenden persischen Königs Xerxes entgegenzutreten. Es stehen 300 kampferprobte Spartaner gegen ein gigantisches persisches Heer – ein fairer Kampf. (TV24)
(mehr)Kritiken (17)
Admittedly an extra-dangerous film currently in every European (crypto)Nazi's mandatory KPZ, but it's not Snyder's fault. A giant hyperbole where mythical monsters threaten the abdomens of Greek übermenschen whose dialogue goes something like this: "I trust that "scratch" hasn't made you useless." "Hardly, my lord, it's just an eye. The gods saw fit to grace me with a spare." Paradoxically, it falls down in the need to emancipate the story with the storyline of Leonidas' woman trying to fight the traitors in Sparta, and these passages are filmed with utter barrenness, but utter earnest. Suddenly all that chauvinism and machismo has the bitter flavor of Vandas' semen, and the blunt theses spouted by Leonidas throughout the film are no longer funny (which they were originally intended to be), but just muscular and stupid. As I say, though, it's not Snyder's fault; instead, he has hereby established himself as America's premier action director/choreographer with his endlessly cheesy aesthetic, which, while it may look terribly pointless at first, does an excellent job of revitalizing the ancient fetish of body and movement with the assistance of contemporary filmmaking devices. This was eventually perfected by Tarsem Singh's Immortals.
()
Oops. Es ist kein Mega-Epos entstanden. 300 ist ein bescheidenes Experiment mit einem zehnseitigen Drehbuch und einem schönen Bluescreen-Hintergrund. Die Dialoge möchten ernst und cool wirken, bei dem Publikum lösen sie aber eher ein Schmunzeln aus. Die Geschichte recycelt das, was uns schon Braveheart und Gladiator erzählt haben. Sie ist aber verkürzt und konzentriert sich ausschließlich auf die visuelle Seite. Der Film sieht gut aus, die Kampfszenen sind ausgefeilt. Der Rest ist aber nur Wasser. Ohne die verlangsamten Aufnahmen würde der Film knapp 60 Minuten dauern. Ein schönes Häppchen. Ich hoffe aber, dass dieser Film kein Anfang eines neuen Subgenres ist.
()
Meines Erachtens ist dies eine total unverdauliche Mischung aus Pathos, dummen Dialogen und einem pseudokünstlerischen Erscheinungsbild, das außer satten Farben und Verlangsamungen nichts Interessanteres bietet als Bausteinchen an aufgemotzten Spartanern sowie eine hie und dort wunderschöne Komposition. Snyder meidet an einer Art Manie. Mehr als die Erzählung selbst interessieren ihn verschiedene Effekten, Accessories oder sprichwörtliche Löckchen, weshalb der Film aus meiner Sicht kein Tempo, keinerlei Explosivität selbst keinen Schimmer an Bedeutung hat. Das comicsähnlichen möchtegernstarke Gerede über Freiheit sowie das sozialismuserbauende feierliche Gerede vom Auf zum letzten Gefecht, irritiert mich unheimlich und die Sterilität der Actionszenen langweilt. Es fehlt hier an einer anständigen choreografischen Idee. Ungeachtet dessen, wie ich das ganze betrachte - es ist ein in der Tat idiotisches Werk, welches gerade noch gut genug ist, um als Anfeuerslogans für ein Eishockeyteamszu dienen ...
()
Frank Miller hat immer besser auf dem Papier funktioniert (und ab einem gewissen Zeitpunkt nicht mal mehr da). 300 ist zwar kein völliger Flop, aber der Zahn der Zeit hat nach nur einem Jahrzehnt bereits genagt. Andererseits können wir diesem Phänomen die Entstehung der konkurrierenden Serie Spartacus verdanken, die in vielerlei Hinsicht einfach viel besser ist. Der gleichnamige Comic ist legendär, aber leider wurde nach 20 Jahren eine Fortsetzung veröffentlicht.
()
Wenn dem Film im Vergleich zum Buch kein völlig unnötiger Handlungsstrang hinzugefügt worden wäre (ja, der mit Leonids Frau und den intriganten Senatoren) und man es bei Rückblenden belassen hätte, wäre er noch mitreißender und 300 wäre zu einem kompromisslosen digital-blutigen atemberaubenden Filmerlebnis geworden. Das ist etwas schade. Aber auch so ist ein schönes Schauspiel über den harten Kampf für die richtige Sache entstanden.
()
"Die Dreigroschenoper" ist ein Film, der versucht, visuell absolut perfekt zu sein, aber auf Kosten vieler anderer Faktoren, die einen guten Film noch besser machen. Und die abgetrennten Köpfe, Gliedmaßen und was weiß ich noch alles fingen nach einer Weile an zu nerven, denn wenn man die unzähligen Zeitlupenszenen hinzunimmt, verheißt das nichts Gutes, zumindest nach meiner Meinung und Bewertung. Ich weiß einfach nicht, was ich von all dem halten soll. Kurz gesagt, ein Film, der das Publikum zweifellos in zwei große Gruppen (in Bezug auf die Kritik) teilt, jede mit ihrer eigenen Wahrheit.
()
Ein visuell bemerkenswerter Film, der vor allem von seiner formalen Seite profitiert. Das Ganze wirkt wie ein langes, actionclipartiges historisches Märchen voller Kampf, Geschrei und Heldensprüchen. Gerard Butler mag ich seit P. S. Ich liebe dich, Lena Headey hat das Gesicht einer Königin, nur Xerxes sah aus wie ein Transvestit, der Sadomaso-Spielchen mag. Meine Bewertung bewegt sich zwischen drei und vier Sternen, angesichts dessen, dass ich 300 für einen verregneten Sonnabendvormittag ausgesucht habe, tendiere ich zur höheren Bewertung.
()
I would like to paraphrase a sentence uttered in the film itself: "My eyes saw a grotesque spectacle summoned from the darkest corners of Miller's strange soul." The rape of history under the guise of a comic adaptation (under which everything is tolerated nowadays, perhaps even if someone made Němcová's Grandmother a dominatrix in a S&M parlour), the fanatically stubborn (though undeniably charismatic) Leonidas, who reminded me of another fanatic, Hoferik from Signum Laudis, so I certainly wouldn't want him as a king, and the slow-motion shots in the second half with their increasing frequency bored me to death. If, given the high box office returns, this empty and narcissistic affair will set the course for the future of the film industry, then we have no choice but to shout "Gott mit uns!" I'm not sure if sentences like "...I felt like smashing someone's face in after the movie was over..." is the right emotion to take away from a film, but I have no doubt that for angry young teens, this will be the best movie of their short lives so far :)
()
I really like Zack Snyder for Watchmen and Dawn of the Dead (and Legend of the Guardians: The Owls of Ga'Hoole and Suckerpunch look very promising, too), but 300 is unfortunately a very big misstep. A visually fancy historical carnage (a bit too digital and artificial for my taste) that to it’s own chagrin takes itself way too seriously. Gerard Butler is one of the least likeable actors and his heroic speeches almost made me burst out laughing. This is not Sparta, this is a bad joke.
()
Snyder is here to entertain! An elegant recycler of the classic sandal adventure and heroic epic wrapped in a beautifully re-styled audiovisual package that has very little to do with history itself, and the search for historical context can hardly be called viewer ignorance. The vast majority of current productions are in the same boat, so why nitpick here when it's clear from the start that the pathetic phrase will be part of every Leonidas (Gerard Butler, the most charismatic leader of the screen a few years back, scores points!) monologue, the purely macho speech of every dialogue, and that the battle will be nothing but visual gluttony of the finest quality? I enjoyed 300 for its relative originality, down to the last drop of digitally redacted blood the characters shed, and I’m certainly not worried about the future of other Hollywood productions. There have already been several similar booms, and in a few years, young angry teens will find their new cult. It is rather surprising how many people, after seeing 300, suddenly crave pure awesomeness, which has survived (and will survive) everything.
()
Both an excellent start and conclusion and... And in the meantime, there is only filler, which is not boring only thanks to the charismatic Butler and the artistic component, which eventually becomes too much. It isn’t completely fair to reproach 300 for its unmistakable macho and even fascist façade, but to criticize its boring action scenes is. The middle part is mostly the clash between the brave Spartans and Persian masses, but the action itself somehow lacks juice. Which is a big problem with this type of movie. Paradoxically, the biggest plus doesn’t come until the stylized final credits.
()
Thanks to the fact that I didn't let myself get overly hyped, despite the excellent trailers, I was able to watch 300 as an unbiased viewer, expecting a quality spectacle with good action – and to my great surprise, I got much more. An amazing film with one of the best visual aspects in recent years. The moment Gerard Butler appeared as the fierce Leonidas, even I, an old cynic, fell in love with Sparta and rooted for them as much as I could, even though I knew how it would probably end, thanks to history and logic. Of course, I have to agree with all the criticisms regarding the overall fascist tone of the story about a "strong, unyielding nation," but for me, the tale of unbreakable warrior discipline remains a story of heroism and determination. As for the visuals, 300 proved that slow-motion shots of blood and warriors can be captivating, even if we've seen a similar scene in a film countless times before. Both battles with the Immortals, the iconic fall into the gorge, and the final spear throw and arrow rain are unforgettable and, as cinematography showed, themselves undefeatable.
()
The film has a nice visual aspect, but the rest is sterile or conceptually problematic. I once invested an incredible 50 bucks in Miller's comic book, influenced by the claim that it is one of the most significant works of comic creation. There is no doubt that it was the worst investment I have ever made in the world of books. Ideologically, it felt like a guide for a young fascist through the world of life values, not to mention the lack of historical credibility, only the visual concept stood out... Overall impression: 40%.
()
The missing color of the palette of historical movie varieties has been put in its place. Thanks to Frank Miller’s imagination we can see the reflection of times so distant for us that we know about them only from myths. But it would be incorrect to call 300 a historical movie. It really would. It is more of an attempt at balancing a fantasy and a story based on true events. This was exactly what Snyder realized and he was able to capture that balance that thanks to the technology he used. With a huge support of the cast, mainly the flawless Gerard Butler and the excellent to gigantic Rodrigo Santoro. I was so looking forward to it and I wasn’t disappointed one bit. Tell them in Lacedaemon, passerby: carrying out their orders, here we lie. I’ll never forget how I felt when leaving the movie theater after seeing 300.
()
Are you kidding??!! That stupid parody was almost better.
()
Frank Miller's comic is absolutely captivating, and Zack Snyder managed to transfer its poetry, brutality, and heroism into the film - simply everything that the comic embodies. There are extra scenes here that are almost unnecessary, but it doesn't change the fact that the battle of the 300 Spartans remains a powerful spectacle that is visually intriguing. I'm captivated, and I was already back when it was released in movie theaters. Just trim it a bit and it would be perfect.
()
Visually completely mannerist and brief testosterone ride that is so stupidly entertaining as to be utterly irresistible. It's certainly not high art, and there are perhaps too many slow-motion moments at times, but on the other hand this is (from my perspective) Zack Snyder's early and peak period, when he delivered three hugely interesting films to audiences within five years. This "hat trick" sort of firmly defined his future visual style, which he then perfected in Watchmen – his subsequent work is unfortunately already heavily decadent (with the minor exception of Man of Steel). [85%]
()
Werbung