Regie:
Kathryn BigelowDrehbuch:
Mark BoalKamera:
Barry AckroydBesetzung:
Jeremy Renner, Anthony Mackie, Brian Geraghty, Guy Pearce, Ralph Fiennes, David Morse, Evangeline Lilly, Christian Camargo, Sam Spruell, Kate Mines (mehr)Streaming (5)
Inhalte(1)
Als wäre der Job der Bombenexperten im Irak nicht schon gefährlich genug, müssen Sanborn und Eldridge, beides Soldaten einer kleinen Elite-Einheit, feststellen, dass ihr neuer Sergeant lebensgefährliche Alleingänge unternimmt und den Tod herauszufordern scheint. Wenn sie den Krieg überleben wollen, müssen sie ihn schnellstmöglich unter Kontrolle bringen. (Concorde Home Entertainment)
(mehr)Kritiken (16)
Mit diesem Film kämpfe ich. Die gesamte Stimmung und Spannung beruhen auf der banalen Tatsache, dass die Bombe jederzeit explodieren kann (aber nicht explodieren muss). Die Figuren sind uninteressant, die Dialoge fürchterlich und der Film hat eigentlich kein dramaturgisches Gerüst (es handelt sich nur um einige aneinandergereihte Situationen, welche die Figuren angesichts des Todes lösen müssen). Als Aussage aus den gegebenen Orten wirkt es aber umso realistischer und hochwertiger. Die Autoren hätten sich vielleicht besser überlegen sollen, ob sie einen spannenden Thriller oder ein interessantes Dokudrama drehen möchten.
()
Das Full Metal Jacket des neuen Jahrtausends - militant, zynisch und räuberisch. Ein auf eingeweidenzerfleischende Art gedrehter Dokufilm über kriegssüchtige Menschen, über zu weit gewachsene Jungen, für die ein gewöhnliches Leben eben viel zu normal ist. Bigelow hat den sprichwörtlichen Schubkarren mit Naturalismus, heißer irakischer Atmosphäre sowie brillanter Schauspielerei vollgeladen. Ein derart dynamisch gefilmtes Kriegsdrama hat hier schon jenen Tagen gefehlt, als Scott auf Falken schoss. Wie er es tat, so lässt auch Bigelow eine moralische Bewertung des Konflikts außen vor, geht aber tiefgründig auf die Psyche der Charaktere ein und lässt selbst von einer soliden Portion an Ironie ab (etwas, was ich beim Black Hawk Dawn letztendlich vermisst habe). Zwei Stunden lang werden hier rohe Kampfszenen und verschwitzte Dialoge schlichtweg durchschnittlicher Soldaten dargeboten. Tödliches Kommando - The Hurt Locker bemüht sich nicht, das Herz des Irak-Krieges anzusprechen, sondern lediglich darum die seltsame Seele eines Kriegers aufzuzeigen. Und in dieser Hinsicht hat Kathryn Bigelow einen besseren und aufmerksameren Job abgeliefert als ihre männlichen Kollegen. Außer Wumms, gibt´s in diesem Film nämlich auch das verdammte Einfühlungsvermögen ... Meines Erachtens ist Tödliches Kommando - The Hurt Locker eines der amerikanischen Highlights des Jahres 2009. Wenn nicht gar die Nummer 1.
()
Ich mag die Filme von Kathryn Bigelow. Tödliches Kommando - The Hurt Locker hat mich aber enttäuscht. Der Hauptheld war fürchterlich nervig (diese Superman-Machos mag ich einfach nicht). Ansonsten habe ich eigentlich nichts zu kritisieren. Die Kamera, die Regie, die permanente Spannung in der Luft, der Gedanke am Ende… Die (für mich) unbekannten Darsteller*innen spielen gut. Es wäre aber trotzdem nicht schlecht gewesen, wenn bekannte Schauspieler*innen (!!!Ralph Fiennes!!!) auf der Leinwand länger als fünf Minuten geblieben wären. Die besten Szenen: Die "Fernschießerei" in der Wüste, die Bombe im Kind, die Dusche, das Ende. Drei Sterne und noch ein kleines Stück dazu.
()
Ich mag eigentlich keine Kriegsfilme, und ich suche auch nicht wirklich danach. Ich habe mich über Tödliches Kommando informiert, weil es einen Hype gab und die Preise so hoch waren. Ich muss zugeben, dass ich nicht einmal glauben will, dass so etwas von einer Frau geschaffen wurde. Kathryn Bigelow scheint besser als jeder andere zu wissen, wie man ein anständiges Kriegsdrama dreht. Ich muss den Kameramann loben, der viele der Szenen noch eindrucksvoller gemacht hat. Die Leistung von (dem mir unbekannten) Renner verdient es wirklich, unter den Oscar-Nominierten zu sein. Allen Erwartungen zum Trotz hat mir der Film gefallen, die Handlung ging voran und ich wurde nicht müde - ein garantiertes Erlebnis. Bessere 4*.
()
Gesehen bei der Challenge Tour - Film-Hunting: Aufgabe Nummer 3 - ein Film, bei dem eine Frau Regie führt. Wenn die amerikanischen Akademie-Mitglieder in der ununterdrückbaren, wohlwollenden Stimmung waren, einmal in hundert Jahren eine Regisseurin auszuzeichnen, dann wüsste ich persönlich von anderen Anwärterinnen als es die Ex von James Cameron ist. Obwohl ich mich den größten Teil des Films fürchterlich langweilte, sagte ich mir, es sei wohl doch keine so schreckliche propagandistische Scheiße wie American Sniper, und ich gebe zumindest ein Sternchen. Eine Szene aber hat mich so aufgebracht, dass ich nicht anders kann, als den Film mit Trash zu bewerten. Und so bleibt mir nur noch Zero Dark Thirty, damit ich mir ein für allemal sage, dass ich dumme amerikanische Kriegsfilme nie mehr anschaue.
()
It's a mystery to me how this brilliant flick didn’t get a wider audience response. What Stone's Platoon meant for an "alternative look" at the Vietnam conflict, Kathryn Bigelow's film means for the current U.S. Army mission in Iraq, and for its guys, who are there trembling for their lives and counting each day until the end of their tour of duty. The film doesn't moralise, it doesn't lecture, it just offers blood, sweat, frustration, the dust of Iraqi roads, fear of death and general paranoia, where even an Iraqi with a camera can be a potential terrorist. Not since Mendes's Jarhead has there been such a good military-themed film.
()
Kathryn Bigelow understands the tough guy heart better than half of Hollywood's major league action directors. This film about a group of bomb squad technicians stuck in the heart of Iraq and struggling daily with the problem of "red or blue?" could not have been made in any other way than as a suspenseful thriller with a sultry atmosphere of hot streets and desert distances. This is perhaps the first cinematic contribution to the subject that doesn't moralize about the good/bad side of warfare or try to understand the souls of Islamic fighters. Instead, it gives us a glimpse into the lives of those who are left with nothing but cynicism and the belief that any proper course of action to disarm is one that doesn't make you scream. Scenes of pulling bombs out of the ground, searching for a detonator in a car, or saving a suicide bomber are all worthy of a discharge because they make your blood run cold. However, the director is ultimately undermined by the screenwriter's stiffer dialogue and the cheap escapade with little Beckham. Otherwise, it’s damn great! 4 ½.
()
Yeah these modern war movies are very much to my liking. Whether it's American Sniper or Lone Survivor, even Hurt Locker has a lot going for it and brings something new to the genre. A bomb squad vs terrorists, slow motion, unease and fear in the air, an excellent Jeremy Renner, too bad Guy Pearce more or less only has a cameo. I had a great time. 80%.
()
I can't say that this award-winning Oscar drama knocked me off my feet, and it won't make it into my top war movies either, as it lacks a cohesive plotline, and the characters, except for the main protagonist, are merely sketched out. It's a depiction of several fragmented scenes from the operations of a unit focused on neutralizing explosives. The authenticity in capturing the overall atmosphere in Baghdad and war-torn Iraq can definitely be appreciated. In comparison to Kathryn Bigelow's film, Hollywood's so-called war movies, like for example Three Kings, seem rather awkward. However, the authenticity of individual scenes and the protagonist's experiences are not all that magnificent. In reality, playing it safe and adhering to caution is much more common, and a soloist indulging in adrenaline would not be understood by their unit colleagues, and especially not by their superiors. I estimate that they would've earned themselves an end to their mission at least three times due to their escapades. American units are specialized and usually call in the appropriate special forces to handle extraordinary situations, so pyrotechnics specialists interfering with the work of snipers or clearing adjacent sectors of terrorists is pure fiction. Another aspect to appreciate in this drama is the absence of the usual patriotic pathos, clichés, and above all, political correctness. Kathryn Bigelow also avoids unnecessary naturalistic repulsiveness, as war in her interpretation is stress, fatigue, constant tension, dirt, and waiting for the end of the mission. Overall impression: 80%.
()
Finally, a proper movie about a bomb squad. Excellently filmed. The opening scene with the robot is flawless. Kathryn Bigelow creates an incredibly exciting atmosphere, and every “disposal" has an ace up its sleeve. I liked Renner in S.W.A.T., and it's a good thing he's sticking to these badass roles. Ralph Fiennes and a small cameo by Evangeline Lilly is also delightful. If there were fewer scenes, I wouldn't hesitate to give it five stars.
()
Quite intimate and unfortunately often also quite uninspiring. It has some truly revolutionary elements and some already seen a hundred times over. In the end, it’s average. A big plus is the fact that Bigelow doesn't lean towards any side. she works as an observer and doesn't add or subtract anywhere, and that’s not very easy – none of the great war movies I can think are 50-50. The sound design is excellent, and will surely be appreciated by connoisseurs and home cinema owners. The sniper exhibition and explosions are especially outstanding. The psychology is average, I expected more. Considering that the competitor was a pleasant, although relatively conceptually stale Avatar, I quite understand the Oscars.
()
The individual sequences are adrenaline packed and Kathryn Bigelow does a good enough job with the “will it explode or not” dilemma to push the viewer into their seat through the simple movements around the mise-en-scène. Unfortunately, the episodic scenes of the life of an elite unit are pasted together in an attempt at a story where the emotions don’t work due to the weak profiling of the characters, while the attempt at a moral insight is not very successful either. It is realistic, probably (fortunately, I can’t judge), but the constantly shaky camera doesn’t work as ingeniously as in other films and actually disrupts the leisurely built atmosphere of an environment where every movement is dangerous. Jeremy Renner’s performance keeps things afloat, providing the viewer some depth they can hold on to. 65%
()
Rather than war action or thrilling bomb defusing, this is a drama following Bravo Group on a tour in Iraq that focuses significantly more on the interactions after a new member, a bomb specialist, is accepted into the team and character development than on the action, firefights or the suffocating atmosphere. Is that wrong? No. Is it good? I don't know. Jeremy Renner and Anthony Mackie's performances are solid, the tension is palpable in certain sequences, and there are many iconic scenes, the most notable of which is clearly the sniper shootout, but the whole thing is a little too long-winded and somehow doesn't progress from the opening through the collision to a noticeable conclusion, rather it just kind of floats along loosely on the same wave and doesn't really deviate from its standard pace. You can see the quality filmmaking, but the message the film delivers is unfortunately nonexistent and it's nothing we haven't seen in other similarly-themed pieces.
()
Let’s make a war movie based on Kathryn Bigelow: We’ll create a setting for a scene and flesh out the location to the last detail. We'll spend the rest of the day explaining to eighty extras what they're supposed to be doing in that location and that they're not supposed to notice the strange people with cameras running around. At the end, we'll put the lead actors on the first marker and explain which way to go and what to do. If a cameraman brings a stabilizer or, heaven forbid, a tripod on set, he'll have 10% of his salary docked. Repeat seven times and we have a feature film. The Hurt Locker could have been perfect if it hadn't stumbled on two things. On a second viewing, we already know that all of the film's visual attributes have been exhausted in the first scene, and from there on the film repeats an established routine. Secondly, despite all sincere efforts, the catharsis comes only in individual scenes through their denouement, but there is no way left to clean up the corners of the whole construct. I wouldn't want to be Cameron coming home from the studio where he's spending his third summer and being told by his old lady: "Tea, where have you been? I put the Oscar on the fireplace, if you don't mind. I'll tell you, that year in Jordan, when we were filming that Hurt Locker, it was hell. I caught dysentery from falafel six times. Yeah, and I went shopping today and I forgot which cornflakes you like. So I grabbed the ones closest to hand. Can you believe they had a whole rack of fucking cornflakes...?"
()
Excellent, realistic, intense, yet boring. I can't help it, but military films of this kind don't really speak to me. There are scenes here that have emotion, but the truth is, I would expect more from women. The emotions are fleeting; otherwise, it's a perfect capture of action that can feel truly realistic, thanks in part to the camera work. It's not a documentary, just an attempt to approach it fairly convincingly. These aren't my kind of movies.
()
Suspenseful through and through, I'll give it that. The most ridiculous thing is that all manner of effort and a great deal of experience can be blown to smithereens, as it were, in one second (sometimes there's at least a helmet left) and any formerly impeccable bomb tech can be reduced to a tossed salad in the next. I will admit with all honestly that it was often had for me and my nerves were in at least ten different buckets when the guy in the strange suit was struggling with all sorts of wires, pliers, and locks. If Kathryn Bigelow wanted to provide a picture of how the work of army bomb squad technicians is no joke, she did it in a grandiose and very evocative way, and I applaud her. Unfortunately, there is an agitprop lurking somewhere in the background that calls for pity and unprecedented admiration and understanding of the American martyrs in Iraq, and I don't like that, because by doing so the Yanks are brainwashing the majority of the average intelligent population, who then project American soldiers as their heroes and saviors. And even though it's a total triumph (certainly in the technical aspects), I still don't get all the Oscars.
()
Werbung