Regie:
Gary RossKamera:
Tom SternBesetzung:
Jennifer Lawrence, Josh Hutcherson, Elizabeth Banks, Liam Hemsworth, Willow Shields, Leven Rambin, Wes Bentley, Woody Harrelson, Stanley Tucci (mehr)Streaming (4)
Inhalte(1)
In der tyrannischen Diktatur von Panem werden die 74. Hungerspiele abgehalten. Alle zwölf Distrikte müssen jeweils zwei Jugendliche als Tribute nominieren, die sich dem medial ausgeschlachteten Kampf um Leben und Tod stellen. Katniss meldet sich in Distrikt 12 freiwillig, um ihre jüngere Schwester Primrose zu schützen. Gemeinsam mit dem zweiten Tributen Peeta, der tiefe Gefühle für sie hegt, soll Mentor Haymitch sie auf den tödlichen Bewerb vorbereiten. Den gnadenlos zynischen Spielregeln zufolge darf nur einer der 24 Gladiatoren überleben. (ORF)
(mehr)Kritiken (18)
Das einzige, was in diesem Film etwas wert ist, d. h. der Stoff, wurde schon originell, energisch und als provokative Satire in Battle Royale verfilmt. Die US-amerikanische Version, die sich um einen ernsten und spannenden Thriller mit einer romantischen Linie bemüht, ist unverdaulich langwierig, klischeehaft und die Kostüme und das Make-up sehen so aus, als ob sie von "Durchgeknallt im All 2" mit Adam Sandler stammen würden. Den zweiten Stern gebe ich für das angenehm zivile Duo der Haupthelden, das als einziges Element des Films nicht wie ein schlechter Witz wirkt.
()
Sowohl als soziales Gleichnis und als Kritik einer Reality-Show ist dies bedauerlicherweise stark neben der Kappe (klassisches Syndrom eines fehlgeleiteten Produktes: Ich kritisiere mich selbst und weiß nichts davon), als Science-Fiction-Film ists´ hoffnungslos unoriginell, als Actionfilm zahnlos, als Drama wiederum pubertierend verblödet ... wobei das Argument, dies sei der absolute Gegenteil des Twilight, können wir schon allein deshalb nicht gelten lassen - weil die Hauptheldin "hart und unnachgiebig" ist, weil Regisseur Ross und insbesondere der Kameramann Stern sich auf einem höheren Level befinden (die rohe Aufnahmemethodik bringt das ganze auf ein höheres als überdurchschnittliches Level) und dass die Geschichte einen bestimmten tiefergehenderen Untertext hat - reicht nicht aus. Die Tribute von Panem - The Hunger Games sind nämlich in ähnlicher Weise poseurhaft verblödet und unbedenklich konsumierbar. Ich würde ja gerne schreiben, dass dies eine Die Truman Show für Teenager ist, doch die Wahrheit sieht so aus, dass dies alles ist, wogegen sich Weirs Film eigentlich kritisch abgrenzt. Wenn es doch bloß als "simple Unterhaltung" funktionieren würde. Doch das tut es nicht. Ohne das Buch zu kennen, wirkt der Film verwirrend, unvollendet und mit obligatorischen Klischees überfüllt und von einer sehr unterbundenen Vorstellungskraft beeinflusst.
()
Leicht überdurchschnittlich, mit einem größeren Potenzial. Ich hatte die ganze Zeit den Eindruck, dass ich über die Welt, in der sich die Hunger Games abspielen, mehr wissen muss, damit ich glauben kann, dass so etwas wirklich möglich ist. Vielleicht deshalb, weil ich die Buchvorlage nicht gelesen habe. So hatte ich Probleme damit, den Gedanken zu akzeptieren, dass schon 74 Jahre ein Massakerwettbewerb stattfindet, um u. a. für Ruhe bei der Bevölkerung zu sorgen, dass es die Menschen akzeptiert haben und dass es irgendwie funktioniert. Es spielt keine Rolle, dass es ein Science-Fiction-Film ist. Ich sollte der Welt, in der sich die Geschichte abspielt, einfach glauben. Der Film bekommt von mir einen Pluspunkt für die prima Besetzung (der Hauptheld könnte nur ein bisschen anders als die Hauptnegativgestalt aussehen, ich habe sie manchmal verwechselt), für das angenehme Tempo (die zwei Stunden waren ziemlich schnell vorbei) und für die Musik von Newton Howard. Die Regie war aber nichts Besonderes. Ich werde wahrscheinlich auch keine Szene im Kopf behalten. Um die nächsten Teile soll sich Francis Lawrence kümmern – hoffentlich sind sie in dieser Hinsicht besser.
()
Bei einem Blick von außen sind die Hunger Games schöner Spaß für Teenager, besetzt mit attraktiven Schauspielern und betonen die jugendliche Rebellion. Es ist jedoch dasselbe, als ob man eine leere Schachtel in hübsches Geschenkpapier einpacken würde. Der Film ist voller Klischees, Motive aus anderen Filmen, logisch unglaublicher Handlungen und endloser Exposition der Charaktere, so dass man selbst auf die versprochene Action lange warten muss. Das Versprechen weiterer Fortsetzungen ist nur ein Trick, um den Menschen immer wieder Geld für dasselbe Thema abzunehmen.
()
Ein weiteres Buchphänomen unserer Generation, das auf die Kinoleinwand übertragen wurde, und ich war überraschend beeindruckt. Im Gegensatz zu den Fantasy-Sagas Die Chroniken von Narnia und Harry Potter hatte ich das Ausgangsmaterial nicht gelesen, so dass ich nur wenig Ahnung von der Geschichte hatte, die ich nur aus den Trailern kannte. Das Interessanteste an dem Film oder besser gesagt an dem Buch ist die Tatsache, dass das treibende Element die Teenager sind, die oft mit mehr Nachdruck um ihr Leben kämpfen als die meisten Erwachsenen. Die erste Hälfte des Films war etwas trocken und langatmig, aber sobald alle Tribute in die Arena auf Leben und Tod entlassen wurden, nahm die Handlung an Fahrt auf und die Spannung wurde allmählich aufgebaut und verdichtet. Der allererste blutige Kampf um Waffen, Lebensmittel und Überlebensmittel war wirklich hart, und ich war sehr gespannt darauf, wie es aussehen würde, wenn im Film Teenager gegeneinander kämpfen würden. Außerdem ist Jennifer Lawrence eine hübsche Frau, die mir zum ersten Mal in Winter's Bone aufgefallen ist, wo sie einer der Positiva des Films war. Kurzum, ein Film, der vielleicht nicht jedermanns Geschmack ist, mich aber angenehm überrascht hat, und neben dem Thema möchte ich die farbenfrohen Kostüme und das Make-up der Figuren sowie die schöne Musik hervorheben.
()
Ach, welch große Enttäuschung mir diese filmische Bearbeitung bereitet hat... Als ich das Buch gelesen habe, war hellauf begeistert, wie man mit solch einem Material filmisch arbeiten kann, ich stellte mir eine tolle Action vor und freute mich wie ein kleiner Junge. Aber das war wahrscheinlich gerade der jungenhafte Fehler. Die erste Hälfte ist absolut sinnlos lang und beginnt einen gefährlich zu langweilen, die zweite Hälfte wiederum nutzt ihr großes Potenzial nicht, das die Buchvorlage bietet. Konnten Nichtleser das eigentlich verstehen und auch, was zwischen Katniss und Peeta in der Vergangenheit passiert ist? Ich werde nicht weiter klagen, aber bei Teil zwei muss viel nachgebessert werden, damit alle Lesefans auf ihre Kosten kommen und wir Zuschauerfans werden.
()
Ich habe das Buch nicht gelesen, daher ist es schwer zu sagen, inwieweit es gelungen ist, aber wenn ich es mir nur als Film vorstelle, ist es über alle Maßen gelungen! Ein wirklich fesselndes Science-Fiction-Abenteuer, das einen packt und nicht mehr loslässt. Ich hätte da ein paar Vorbehalte, es ist keine Spitzenbewertung, aber selbst nach all den Jahren komme ich immer noch genauso begeistert zu Die Tribute von Panem zurück, als hätte ich es zum ersten Mal gesehen. Ich hatte eine großartige Zeit und kam keine einzige Sekunde lang aus dem Staunen heraus. Ein wirklich hervorragender Film, dessen Thema mir bisher noch nicht begegnet war.
()
Twilight for fifteen year-old intellectuals, and I don’t mean it as bad as it may sound. Hunger Games is for the same age group as that other rubbish, but at least it tries (and in the book maybe successfully, I don’t know, can’t judge, didn’t read it) to deliver some social criticism, it’s also about a lot more than whether some unstable idiot will take a vampire or a werewolf as her lover, and the motivations of the protagonists are much deeper. As an undemanding blockbuster, it’s pretty good, it looks quite nice (given the low budget), and the art design of the Capitol and its inhabitants was captivating. The most interesting themes, though, are only sketched out, but maybe the upcoming sequels will manage to complete them, I’m curious. What bothered me the most was the unrealistic behaviour of the characters in the Arena and the fact that I didn’t understand at all how the institution of the Hunger Games is supposed to help the Capitol rule the other regions. The film is not great by any means, but it was decent fun. Jennifer Lawrence is brilliant. 7/10
()
The Hunger Games is another of those interesting fantasy book series that got adapted into a Hollywood movie. I was quite reluctant to see this. Even though I like fantasy films very much, I never know what to expect from them, and what I’ve seen lately was mostly so mediocre that it made me sad. But in the end, I made time for The Hunger Games one Sunday afternoon. I chose Sunday because the film has almost three hours. A film of this length must inevitably have some balls to grab my attention and keep me from falling asleep. The first half an hour was an introduction to the fantasy world in question. There was nothing much going on, but it served its purpose. Nevertheless, at the moment the titular hunger games kicked off, I started to enjoy the movie very much. I found the premise really intriguing, and the way this movie was shot is also not exactly ordinary. The story is quite realistic, with a lot of food for thought. And I must say that even though I felt kind of skeptical about this fantasy world at first, over time I grew fond of it and I began to wonder what the creators – and the source book – have in store for us next time. So yes, I must say that there is something about this world. The execution is also well-done, so the remaining two and half hours passed in the blink of an eye. I was satisfied with the result, and now I’m curious about the sequel.
()
A roller coaster of a plot, which greatly enhances your desire to read a book, but also works as a surprising teenage hit right to the very last minute. The characters are spot-on, the actors amazing, the relationships believable, and despite several seemingly exaggerated scenes towards the end, it's actually hard for me to find any specific criticism. Perhaps if the second installment goes deeper into the interaction between the main characters, I will be fully thrilled. Those who mock the partial resemblance to the works of George Orwell or The Truman Show have failed to grasp that there is a slightly different metaphor here. Katniss Everdeen for the win. P.S.: I fell in love with the book almost instantly, and after reading the entire saga, I would give Suzanne Collins almost anything. Just for the record.
()
The Hunger Games, or dystopia for teenagers, utilizes the concept of fighting in an arena, which has been used many times in literature and film. You shouldn't expect any deeper psychology or convincing portrayal of society, but who would expect that from a Hollywood production of this kind anyway? The level of violence is adjusted to the target audience, so anyone expecting uncompromising, gritty action will inevitably be disappointed. However, considering the target segment of the audience, the film works decently on an emotional level, skillfully playing with sentiment, and the relationship triangle between the adolescent protagonists is relatively solid. The cast greatly helps the film, with young stars led by the charismatic Jennifer Lawrence delivering their performances reliably. On the other hand, the depiction of the social elite from the Capitol feels cliché, resembling an unwanted parody of American television show business mixed with a drug-induced trip by a film costume designer. Although I am far from being the target audience, I would probably lean towards giving the film 3 stars, if it weren't for the chaotic editing that significantly drags down the film, especially in the more action-packed scenes. Overall impression: 45%.
()
Visually and conceptually repulsive. It's true that after the first half, where farcical fascist harlequins prepare the plebeians for bread and circuses, things improve slightly. However, I still don't understand why Jennifer Lawrence in the second part doesn't have a bump on her forehead, isn't gnawing on rattlesnakes' rattles, or riding a motorcycle among doves. And does she love the young baker or the young Thor? One would hope to accept this factory of sterility, clichés, and silly plot twists as a guilty pleasure, but even that seems unlikely. A telling moment is when the youth head to the "arena," and instead of appearing pale and vomiting or urinating as if landing on Normandy, they act as if they're about to embark on a pioneer camp obstacle course. I kept hoping for Professor Subzero to come in with his goalie stick and smash them like Ron Hextall during moments of mental distress.
()
I didn't expect anything at all, and yet the film surprised me quite a bit. Anyone who starts talking about artificial romance completely missed the point and reading their reviews is a waste of time because they won't be objective. Hunger Games is a game, or rather a romance only on the surface, just like society today (or most of it), which this film criticises in a rather sophisticated way. It starts with the same system as the Hunger Games (a tribute to wars), through pathetic wishes for happiness, appalling (intentionally, for God's sake!) costumes, so criticising the film for that is probably the same as being upset that you're not hungry anymore after eating. As far as philosophy is concerned, I don't really have anything to criticise. Technically, the film is quite decent (the visuals of the city, the sets, etc.). The only slight issue arises during the actual game. Some things seemed a bit half-hearted and sometimes the viewer gets lost in what is meant to be taken seriously and what is just a wink. I won't dwell on the handheld camera, nor the quite inconsistent action scenes (sometimes naturalistic, other times "veiled"). Gary Ross seems be a much more captivating storyteller and philosopher than a technician and director of action scenes. I mustn't forget Jennifer Lawrence, who shines as the modern-day heroine and will one day replace Kate Beckinsale, Milla Jovovich, and other tough chicks, and she to be a much better actress too. Hunger Games is definitely not for classics and narrow minds. I don't quite understand the huge profits because I expected most people would not appreciate the content (which I assume has happened), but apparently, that doesn't prevent it from being a film experience, although perhaps a slightly different one.
()
Unpretentious and ego-laden entertainment for a teen audience that doesn't give a damn about what Battle Royale is and how much the success of a great theme depends on all other aspects of filmmaking. The Hunger Games is not that badly made, it has a few bright moments and above all it boasts an excellent Jennifer Lawrence, who in the Japanese original was sorely missed in the flood of Asian faces, but regardless of how good and fun it is, this nothing more than another overblown bubble under the Hollywood banner, which, although it ensures prestige and money, can also overshadow even the best subject with a wave of pathos and American heroism. While Battle Royale was a bold and creative satire that couldn't be taken entirely seriously, The Hunger Games pretends to be a modern stylized sci-fi with a serious idea of a totalitarian future, but its potential ends exactly where it begins: with the premise. The film holds together really only thanks to the believable and very pleasant chemistry between the two leading actors. I’m certainly not disappointed, but that's only because I expected a similar result in advance. 60%
()
The idea for the book just spontaneously came to the author’s mind and most certainly wasn’t inspired by the Japanese Batoru rowaiaru (2000). Well, let's just say I’m not buying it. I'm going to rudely assume it was a standard American rip-off, just with added bombast, a play on emotions, and a moronic plot. Even if the Americans had set fire to all twenty-four athletes, they couldn't have put together a pair of characters that would entertain me as much as the Japanese duo, Pot lid and Binoculars. Those of you who know something about me must have known that I wasn’t going to be happy with the casting of the lead. Jennifer Lawrence does have something going for her; after all, she is one of the world's top actresses regarding "leaked" photos and videos. There’s no denying that. I just think she should take up poker instead of acting. Her constant unreadable expression can compete even with the likes of Ben Affleck or Mickey Rourke. However, the latter helped himself to it surgically, which disqualifies him in my eyes. The film didn’t start off looking entirely bad, but as time went on, my hopes started to fade, only to vanish completely. The film was made to look like it was about the right values, but actually, it just wasted over two hours on yet another story about a love triangle that teens and American housewives just can’t get enough of. / Lesson learned: Never eat alone and don’t be the first one to eat in a group.
()
The viewer in Hunger Games apparently got what he wanted. The pseudo-original theme, which is killed by the burden of romance and seemingly tough scenes, in shots that want to appear so artistically that they sound cheap. Never mind that the film devoured all the interesting ideas that this theme should have. Just as long as there are cool heroes, some tender love, and especially incredibly terrible costumes, for which the film deserves a Raspberry award, preferably rotten. More: http://www.filmovy-denik.cz/2012/04/proc-maji-hunger-games-takovy-uspech.html
()
The Hunger Games is a film that is very purposefully made, and one that was already destined for commercial success – given the marketing frenzy that preceded its release, of course. An arena of death where children massacre each other – I don't know if that kind of subject matter is cruel, cynical, or just plain nasty, but it's still a terribly interesting topic for a film that so massively caters to audiences. I don't think there was any attempt at any resonance here, given the setting and the profile of the production itself. So I'm not going to evaluate the "seriousness of the content" in any depth, and others have already done that here in an informed way. The formal aspects, especially the visuals, are bombastic – the gorgeous setting and affluence of the Capitol contrasts brilliantly with the poverty that characterizes the vast majority of all the Districts. Despite the omnipresent "pomp and grandeur", I preferred the more human or personal storylines of the film – the central duo come across as likeable and very easily win your sympathy. Personally, I was expecting more pathos, more wringing of emotions and pushing the envelope, which in the end didn't happen. The question is whether to consider this a positive or negative aspect, because I really expected more of those emotions there. On the other hand, there was a moment that moved me (but that's probably because I'm an overly sensitive soul), and that was when SPOILER ALERT Katniss buries little Rue and holds up her fingers in tribute to District 11. END SPOILER It was such a beautifully touching human moment, almost unique out of the entire Hunger Games in its intensity. This is admittedly very subjective (though what rating isn't...), but given that I devoured the running time of slightly over two hours in one breath without pause, I have no reason to rate it differently, nor do I "feel" like I should :-) I respect all the objective criticisms, but they did not affect my final impression in the least :))
()
I understand the negative reviews saying it's too long or that it's standard nonsense for teenagers, but only one or two stars? My expectations were based on those critical reviews, but instead I got a movie which was entertaining from beginning to end (seriously!) and one of the biggest surprises of the year. Quite a good script, albeit with a few goofs, but I didn’t mind. The movie only confirmed that Jennifer Lawrence is one of the most talented actresses today.
()
Werbung