Regie:
Peter BergDrehbuch:
Peter BergKamera:
Tobias A. SchliesslerBesetzung:
Mark Wahlberg, Taylor Kitsch, Emile Hirsch, Ben Foster, Eric Bana, Ali Suliman, Alexander Ludwig, Sammy Sheik, Scott Elrod, Rohan Chand, Marcus Luttrell (mehr)Streaming (5)
Inhalte(1)
Afghanistan 2005: Vier Soldaten der US-Spezialeinheit Navy SEALs werden mit der Aufgabe, den Aufenthaltsort eines führenden Taliban-Kämpfers zu verifizieren, auf eine Beobachtungsmission in die Berge der afghanischen Provinz Kunar entsendet. Als die Männer bei ihrem Einsatz eine folgenschwere moralische Entscheidung treffen müssen, überschlagen sich die Ereignisse: Kommunikativ abgeschnitten von ihrer Einheit sehen sich die Soldaten innerhalb kürzester Zeit einer Übermacht von Taliban-Kämpfern gegenüber. Ohne jeden Ausweg müssen sie sich in dem unwegsamen Gebiet der Berge Afghanistans einem aussichtslosen Kampf stellen, der sie nicht nur physisch, sondern auch mental an die Grenzen des menschlich Erträglichen führt... (Universum Film)
(mehr)Videos (42)
Kritiken (12)
Das Intro ist OK. Der mittlere, längste Survival-Teil des Films ist spannend, visuell übersichtlich und effektvoll verarbeitet, mit mehreren düsteren, harten Szenen. Das Finale ist eine vereinfachende politische Propaganda für einen durchschnittlichen US-Zuschauer, über die man schmunzeln muss. Insgesamt ist der Film eine gute Entspannung, die unter Staub so schnell wie alle anderen Barg-Filme verschwindet.
()
I suspect an agitational order from the Department of Defense selling one of its "based on a true story" films. I do not deny the power of the plot, nor the willingness to bow before the fallen and salute the bereaved. From the middle onwards, I was just terribly annoyed by Berg's direction, which pushes pathos out of the screen (in slow-mo so long that it borders on parody), gradually losing contact with the protagonists, who become nothing more than bodies falling from rocks, covered in bloody welts. The first contact, without music and with a "predator" camera, is flawless, but I simply don't think the constant subjective close-ups of faces create the right action military drama. In the final act, I felt ashamed for the creators. It’s only functional as an acted intermezzo for "Medal of Honor."
()
Peter Berg knows how to shoot a proper action movie for men who leave their handkerchiefs at home and go watch a real shootout. However, in this movie, he portrayed one real story, which he filmed in an absolutely unlikely way. It is so unrealistic that it is striking even for me. And I’m usually not that hard to please. It’s unbelievable what the guys survived. The height from which they fell, the number of bullets they dodged and the number of bullets in their body with which they managed to hobble away. Incredible. Despite the fact that the whole way up the hill was stretched in a really stupid way. It’s a real pity that it was so stupid, because everything else was working. Including the amazing expressive music from Explosions in the Sky as well as the Navy Seals unit full of tough guys.
()
Following Gravity and All Is Lost (and, to some extent, Captain Phillips), Lone Survivor is another high-contact fight for survival, placing vicarious experience over a complicated plot. Instead of examining the film’s content, it suffices to read the title. With the exception of the introductory panoramas of the picturesque Afghan landscape (which can be understood as part of an effort to not demonise the whole country, but only the Taliban…though the film was shot in New Mexico), Berg relies predominantly on point-of-view shots and close-ups. The camera’s close proximity to the characters occasionally results in a lack of clarity, though it also adds an unpleasant veracity. The impression of rawness is aided by the film’s R rating, thanks to which we can “enjoy” every shot-off finger and every bone-breaking impact on a rock. The film’s long, superbly intensified action core with minimum pathos is unfortunately put in a context that is not very sophisticated. After a broad introduction, the members of the team blend together, the Taliban are evil because they cut off heads, and any indication of the current American military’s inadequacies is quickly suppressed (the unpleasant hazing of a new recruit rapidly transmutes into an inspiring rhyme). In contrast to what we have witnessed (a fatally botched mission) and what in places had a refreshing tinge of ambivalence (the argument about what to do with a captured enemy combatant), the film ends with the cheap pre-credits glorification of the soldiers involved. – SPOILER: With most of them, it’s impossible to avoid the not-insignificant feeling that we are supposed to consider them heroes simply because they didn’t die. END SPOILER – After All is Lost, where I was bothered by the lack of value added, I wouldn’t have expected that I would write this, but this time I would have preferred a pure survival flick without any information aimed at bringing depth to the story. 65%
()
A not very sophisticated war movie that disgusted me in the first half with the awful black and white view of the world by the Americans, for whom anyone wearing a turban is a dangerous enemy. Fortunately, things get better in the third act, which gets its feet back on the ground in this regard. Even with all the whistling, the survival-combat part was pretty good fun.
()
Werbung